<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Roosenmaallen.com &#187; Energy Savings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roosenmaallen.com/tag/energy-savings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roosenmaallen.com</link>
	<description>Computers, spirituality, and the other things that make me go.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:25:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Go green by going black? &#8230;not convinced.</title>
		<link>http://roosenmaallen.com/2007/12/23/go-green-by-going-black-not-convinced/</link>
		<comments>http://roosenmaallen.com/2007/12/23/go-green-by-going-black-not-convinced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Roosenmaallen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roosenmaallen.com/2007/12/23/go-green-by-going-black-not-convinced/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just came across an interesting post about energy savings based on the colour of a webpage (specifically, Google &#8211; but the idea applies everywhere):  A black Google start screen? &#124; Wired Gecko.
I&#8217;ve found other posts dating back to May of this year (The Numbers Guy) on the subject, so it&#8217;s really not a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came across an interesting post about energy savings based on the colour of a webpage (specifically, Google &#8211; but the idea applies everywhere):  <a href="http://wiredgecko.net/2007/12/a-black-google-start-screen/">A black Google start screen? | Wired Gecko</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found other posts dating back to May of this year (<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/does-a-darkened-google-really-save-electricity-104/">The Numbers Guy</a>) on the subject, so it&#8217;s really not a new idea.</p>
<p>The largest part of my doubt is the question of technology. In a CRT, it does indeed use more energy to display bright colours than dark (ref. <a href='http://www.microtech.doe.gov/EnergyStar/info.htm'>DOE Energy Star Desktop Information</a>). A CRT produces bright colours by directing an energy beam at the front of the screen; more brightness == more energy used.</p>
<p><span id="more-24"></span></p>
<p>As pointed out by <a href='http://graphicsoptimization.com/blog/?p=43'>Graphics Optimization</a>, the technology in an LCD monitor is entirely different &#8211; the brightness is provided by a backlight of some description, and colours are produced by filtering that white backlight with liquid crystals. In this scheme the lowest energy consumption is for a white pixel, where nothing is filtered. Turning a pixel black requires filtering pretty much everything, so uses the most energy.</p>
<p>The DOE report mentioned above appears to have been published in 2001 (<code>curl -I http://www.microtech.doe.gov/EnergyStar/info.htm</code> gives a Last-Modified date of November 27, 2001), when CRTs  were far more prevalent than they are today. That said, the CRT isn&#8217;t dead &#8211; just old, heavy, hot and bulky. If you (like me) do still use CRTs heavily, there are things you can do to reduce your impact:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href='http://www.blackle.com/'>Blackle</a> is a frontend for Google which displays in white-on-black. As of this writing, their homepage claims to have saved 370,654.618 Watt-Hours of energy, versus searching Google directly. <em>Note that in a side-by-side comparison their search results are not identical to Google&#8217;s. This is possibly due to their own customizations (the first result for &#8220;bob&#8221; is about energy savings) or Google tailoring my results when I search google.com directly.</em></li>
<li><span style='text-decoration: underline;'>User Style Sheets</span> allow you to override the display of some/all pages you visit. The method is different for each browser, but here are a couple starting points:
<ul>
<li><a href='http://www.mozilla.org/unix/customizing.html#usercss'>Firefox</a> lets you set these overrides in your userContent.css file.</li>
<li>Safari allows you to set your user stylesheet from the Advanced Preferences pane, or you can install <a href='http://hetima.com/safari/stand-e.html'>SafariStand</a>, which allows you to set specific stylesheets for individual domains (bonus: this allows you to override the nasty serif fonts used on NYTimes.com and a few other newspapers!)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>OS-Level <span style='text-decoration: underline;'>Accessibility Settings</span> often provide options for white-on-black or other high-contrast display modes which will affect your entire system.</li>
</ul>

	Tags: <a href="http://roosenmaallen.com/tag/energy-savings/" title="Energy Savings" rel="tag">Energy Savings</a>, <a href="http://roosenmaallen.com/tag/google/" title="Google" rel="tag">Google</a>, <a href="http://roosenmaallen.com/tag/web/" title="Web" rel="tag">Web</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://roosenmaallen.com/2007/12/23/go-green-by-going-black-not-convinced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
